
A few months ago, I posted on the new VUE Cisco text requirements that would be coming in 2008 to combat Certification fraud. These included:
-Thumbprint scanning
-Digital signatures
-Test forensics
The first two are obvious ways to prevent impostors from taking certification exams for you. However, this is nowhere NEAR as big of a problem as brain dumps / illegal "practice exams". This is the aim of the test forensics...but what does THAT mean? How can a certification exam tell if you're cheating?
Last month, Network World magazine posted a great article on the subject...and I quote:
The metrics (test forensics) reveal statistics such as how long it took the student to
answer each test item, which answers were changed during the test, and
how much time the student needed to complete the test. These metrics
are compared with a historical baseline value, and too much variation
raises a red flag. Before the student even walks out the door of the
test center, the test results can be called into question, triggering
further investigation.
Interesting...of course, I'm sure all the thoughts immediately go to the "false positive" world of real canidates being flagged incorrectly...but I would think these candidates would have nothing to fear anyway (they could handle an oral interview, or whatever follow-up there was)...What do you think?
PS - Vue said that 2008 would be a huge year for implementing these new security measures, but I have yet to thumbprint-scan or digitally sign for any exams...has anyone seen these new security measures???